- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Let’s
 take the current scenario in corporate cube farms across the world. I’m
 talking about the “post-solid raise and bonus world”, which, from my 
estimates, has withered away since the late 90’s.
Imagine
 you have a strong work year. Not a monster year, but a strong, solid 
year. The feedback supports it. And review time comes, and you get a 3% 
or so raise, and a 4–5% bonus. Maybe. You probably get even less than 
this.
 
 
Now, most bonuses are taxed at about 40% or so, which means your bonus is really 3% or somewhere in that vicinity.
Next,
 your raise gets wiped out from cost of living. So really, you’ve broken
 even at best. Think of a treadmill where you run faster, just to keep 
the speed you had last year.
As for your 
bonus, it really amounts to very little, if any. Because there’s a 
chance you had a one time expense, or something which that money went 
to.
Ah, and here’s where it gets fun. 
Because in the “post-solid raise and bonus world”, there’s a high 
probability of your team size shrinking, or, your boss increasing your 
responsibilities, without the measurable increase in compensation. So 
now, you work harder, just to keep pace with last year.
Compare
 this with a successful business owner/entrepreneur. One correct lever 
pulled, one tweak made, can result in skyrocketing gains and 
lifechanging money for a business. None of which will be punished or 
“held back” by some silly annual review technicality.
This
 is why no salary seems good enough, unless you increases/bonuses 
reflect your work level. And from employee surveys and job hopping 
stats, they never do.
To combat this, you have two options:
- Job jump, since you can make 3 to 5 to 5 to 6 times any annual review on a good job jump, up to a certain point of course
- Start and grow your own side business
And
 I’d also add, the probability of a person feeling like no salary is 
good enough increases with age and time in the corporate cube farm. Why?
 Because they see, over and over again, the broken promises by middle 
managers, the numerous annual reviews which don’t match up money with 
feedback, and the constant “change in direction.”